January 10, 2015

Achieving Control Of Lodge Experiences

   The governance of a lodge rests heavily on the shoulders of all the officers, especially the WM and the Wardens, who are responsible leaders implementing the image of Masonry and their lodge in particular. Unfortunately, there are some local lodge officers who have not studied or stressed the importance of their overall image.  
   Lodge image, its success or failure, is influenced by member experience and can impact any lodge faster now than at any time in history. Lodge experience, whether good or bad, can spread all over the world in no time, thanks to social media. Every interaction with a member is critical, because we never know which experience could suddenly affect potential candidates, as well as current members or a lodge within any community.
   Many lodge officers have already learned that favourable contacts and modern methods of good business practices improve member experiences that can be beneficial. Improving the member experience during any interactions with lodge officers or the lodge itself is an ongoing and hands on endeavour.
   All impacts on member experiences are equally significant. The critical first impression and continued emphasis on member experiences requires coaching and acceptance of many new or improved lodge governance methods, the ability to relate with 21st Century Masons, providing good programming, and the use of modern technology.
   Local lodge coaching may sound strange, but in principle it's not much different from coaching any team. We should constantly measure and coach our lodge officers and lodges; collect a lot of performance data to analyse it, using all data to identify areas of improvement; and implementing a process to make sure those improvements are implemented by our lodge officers. Unfortunately, many dais officers take a very narrow approach to collecting the data they need to properly understand member experiences and keeping their lodges both growing and progressive. This makes it hard to identify opportunities to improve, and even harder to predict the results any given improvement might achieve. Collecting the right local lodge data to set goals and do proper analysis contributes to making more informed lodge officer decisions that will more effectively optimize the lodge system, as well as assuring better lodge results.
   First, we need to properly measure and understand member experiences in order to know where we stand and whether our future lodge improvements are effective. Second, it's essential to broaden our perspectives and develop a rating or system that measures member intent, interaction, and perception. Some examples are as follows:
 
Intent: A potential member or even a current member's reasons for belonging to a specific lodge and the activities offered.
Intent can be measured by simple surveys. Unfortunately, many lodge officers don't conduct surveys or consider it as a waste of time.
Interaction: The specific steps or actions taken by lodge officers in an effort to complete goals. Interaction is measured and
evaluated using system-performance reports, actionable summaries, best practices, and is just an analysis of what is happening or what actually happened.
Perception: The emotional value a member places on the ease and efficiency with which lodge goals were accomplished.
Perception is evaluated using surveys which lodges seldom utilize for their own benefit..
 
Surveys Alone Are Not the Answer
   Many lodges could use surveys to measure member satisfaction. These are an essential component of any member experience measurement, but some surveys focus only on the member's perception of the lodge interactions. In order to improve perceptions, it's necessary to understand in great detail the reality underlying them. However, surveys must be combined with lots of performance data. This is where effective analytics can extract the necessary information to measure intent and interaction to get a true picture of the member experience.
   So what do we measure? Although it may seem overwhelming, we need to capture much more data to truly manage and improve lodge member experience ratings. This can come from standardised reports, such as goal/task completion details, event development, ritual competency, etc. The information provides even more insight into the journey of our members and lodge officer development. In order to find out how a lodge or lodge officers are performing from a member's perspective, we must combine all of this data and ask the right types of questions as we analyse it.
   For example, to analyse a member's reason for joining a specific lodge, we might consider using goal/task-specific reports, exit point reports why members may not be regularly attending lodge. Evaluate this data against survey data and member interaction behavior to get a much clearer picture of the overall member experience. It's important to understand member behaviour, and lodge patterns which drive lasting improvements.
   By asking the right types of questions of our local lodge system and members, then capturing and analyzing operational data, we will not only get a truer picture of the experience, but additionally, the analytical information will provide the visibility needed to track down and fix issues that impact local lodge experiences and image in a specific lodge and surrounding lodges.
   When we are able to measure the right data, analyze it, and improve the problem areas we uncover in a systematic and predictable way, and we will have arrived. Moreover, we will get a firm understanding of managing member experiences in any lodge and can enjoy the benefits of providing a great member experience both for the image of Masonry and any lodge in particular. However, this process rests on the progressive attitudes of the local dais and other lodge officers.
Fraternally,
R.:W.: Bro. John Loayza
Assistant Grand Chancellor
GL Leadership Committee
Grand Lodge of Illinois, A.F. & A.M.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home